Sunday, April 26, 2009

The Man Who Changed the World

The Islamic Revolution is depicted in this video, i think better than any text book could tell it. This being an occurrence of the late 70's early 80's everything was video taped and I think it helped me understand the whole weight of the situation better because I was able to learn about it while watching real footage and hearing the story first hand from the people who were involved.
This video made my sympathize with Jimmy Carter, although in the beginning of the video I didn't find it all that shocking that there would be an uprising against American imperialism disguised as a monarchy under the Shah who basically did nothing. Granted, I understand how this arrangement benefits America but after having studied the history of the Middle East, I do not find it at all surprising that there would be a revolution because of this.
Although at first i thought perhaps America, morally, is at fault here, when the students seized the American embassy I felt a line had been crossed. This is when I began to sympathize with Carter. Despite his efforts, the odds were never on his side. At the end of the documentary when it was explained how it was the first time a foreigner was able to influence an American election and humiliate a US president, I really began to feel sorry for him because although I knew he only served one term and had therefore lost the election Reagan, I felt that he put some serious effort into the situation. This issue in Iran spans the entirety of his term. When you think Jimmy Carter, you think Iran.
Khomeini on the other hand, I find fascinating. For one man in the modern world to cause such an enormous revolution to me was astonishing to watch. The really footage of the events of the revolution took me back. The amount of support he had showed the majority without a doubt. It is mind boggling to think that an entire countries majority is that unhappy with the way their state is being run. To me it seemed to be almost like French Revolution status. I found this revolution interesting and didn't feel a bias towards it at all, until the episode with the hostages at the American Embassy in Tehran. This is a situation that as an American hits you in the heart and can create a bias. Those poor people were pushed around by Iranians for 15 months and there was so little that could be done about it. And the fact that they waiting 5 mins after Reagan was sworn in was so humiliating to Carter. I find it unfortunate that Carter basically spent his whole term handling the issues in Iran and a large majority of it was designated to the hostage situation, yet the foreign leaders deliberately wouldn't free them until Carter was no longer responsible.

2 comments:

  1. I like the points you made in this blog; touching upon Carter and Khomeini and a bit on the shah. I liked to read about your view on Carter it was really interesting. I understand where you are coming from and all I can say is its just politics. Even thought the US has a tendency to get into other peoples business, what they did in taking the shah in for cancer treatment, I feel was the right thing to do and it just is bad, but expected, that the Iranian people would riot against our actions. It is also important to point out that most revolutions have a significant number of students behind it, so for students to take over the American embassy because of what Carter did shows the mentality of that era.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If the United States were to not take in the Shah when he had no where to go and needed treatment, i agree that it would be wrong. I cant blame the Iranians who became anti shah and anti American but at the same time, what could they expect. The Shah was basically the puppet of the United States for years. Khomeini and his followers couldn't expect the US to just leave him hanging regardless of if it meant fighting fire with fire.

    ReplyDelete